User talk:Jacek Halicki
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive1 (do 31.12.2013)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive2 (do 30.06.2014)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive3 (do 30.08.2014)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive4 (do 14.10.2014)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive5 (do 15.11.2014)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive6 (do 28.12.2014)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive7 (do 29.01.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive8 (do 16.03.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive9 (do 03.05.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive10 (do 23.05.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive11 (do 08.07.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive12 (do 25.08.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive13 (do 16.10.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive14 (do 20.12.2015)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive15 (do 26.02.2016)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive16 (do 02.05.2016)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive17 (do 29.06.2016)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive18 (do 22.08.2016)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive19 (do 23.10.2016)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive20 (do 26.12.2016)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive21 (do 04.03.2017)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive22 (do 14.05.2017)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive23 (do 27.07.2017)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive24 (do 28.09.2017)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive25 (do 07.12.2017)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive26 (do 14.02.2018)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive27 (do 06.05.2018)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive28 (do 16.08.2018)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive29 (do 13.10.2018)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive30 (do 08.12.2018)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive31 (do 26.10.2019)
- User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive32 (do 12.10.2020)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Park w Piławie Dolnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Support Good quality. -- |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kościół Jana Chrzciciela w Mościsku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kościół zielonoświątkowy św. Antoniego w Świdnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Dzierżoniów, zespół tkalni, ul. Kilińskiego 14 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Done-- |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Dzierżoniów, zespół tkalni, ul. Kilińskiego 14 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Budowlana 2 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Budowlana 2 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 2 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 3 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 3 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kapliczka w Opoczce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 8 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 8 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 9 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 10 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kapliczka w Lutomii Dolnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 10 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 15 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 6 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 6 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 16 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 2 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kościół zielonoświątkowy św. Antoniego w Świdnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 20 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=small} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 20 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Łukowa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Łukowa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Świętokrzyska 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Jana Nepomucena w Piskorzowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Jana Nepomucena w Piskorzowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 25 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 25 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 26 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 27 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
|
File:Martin Van Maele - La Grande Danse macabre des vifs - 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
95.110.119.250 20:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 27 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 8 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 30 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 30 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 31 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 32 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 33 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 7 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Qi Categorization issues[edit]
Hi Jacek Halicki, you recently got lots of new quality images, frequently for photographs of buildings from the market place in Świdnica. Unfortunately, I must decide which type of architecture is shown here when I categorize quality images on the page Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted. I can qualify architecture as public buildings or residential buildings or as "other". At the moment I stick to "other", because these are probably buildings with mixed purposes, shops in the basement, offices or apartments in the upper floors. So if that should be done differently, then please specify which type of architecture is shown or please change my entries. Lots of thanks from --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 33 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 33 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 34 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 35 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 15 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 35 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Fixed-- |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Grodzka 1 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, ul. Grodzka 1 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Świdnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 41 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
Comment Good quality (once issue correctly identified by --QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Świdnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Krzywa Wieża w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 26 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 27 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 16 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 29 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Świdnica, Rynek 29 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Ratusz w Ząbkowicach Śląskich (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Fryderyk Chopin w 1847 roku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kirtap (talk) 22:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]
Dear Jacek Halicki,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Cukierki pańska skórka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 E-papieros Wismec R80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Jacek Halicki! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |
|
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Florian Ceynowa.jpg[edit]
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Florian Ceynowa.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 20:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2021 Starostwo Powiatowe w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Pasztety domowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kaplica na Cierniaku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 02:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Oficerowie 27 pcz w Ilniku.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kaplica na Cierniaku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2020 Kaplica na Cierniaku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2021[edit]
Drogi Wikimedianinie,
piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!
Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.
Pozdrawiam, Jamnik z Tarnowa Speak? 15:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine[edit]
Привіт!
З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.
Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.
Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.
Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.
Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.
Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Приєднуйтеся!
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm
wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30[edit]
Привіт!
Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!
Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:
| Регіон | К-ть пам'яток | К-ть фото |
|---|---|---|
| Севастополь | 1 | 1 |
| АР Крим | 12 | 51 |
| Закарпаття | 26 | 96 |
| Миколаївщина | 29 | 81 |
| Рівненщина | 36 | 186 |
| Херсонщина | 36 | 83 |
| Житомирщина | 55 | 324 |
| Донеччина | 57 | 153 |
| Тернопільщина | 62 | 234 |
| Буковина | 75 | 220 |
| Луганщина | 82 | 90 |
| Львівщина | 82 | 351 |
| Кіровоградщина | 88 | 181 |
| Волинь | 98 | 270 |
| Одещина | 115 | 383 |
| Сумщина | 129 | 414 |
| Дніпропетровщина | 139 | 278 |
| Київ | 159 | 248 |
| Хмельниччина | 166 | 538 |
| Полтавщина | 171 | 594 |
| Харківщина | 175 | 625 |
| Київщина | 181 | 651 |
| Черкащина | 186 | 455 |
| Прикарпаття | 240 | 305 |
| Вінничина | 242 | 775 |
| Запоріжжя | 253 | 317 |
| Чернігівщина | 305 | 519 |
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:
- «Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
- «Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
- «Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Приєднуйтеся!
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
 |
⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐
The file File:2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 |
File:Sathya Sai Ratnakaram.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
1989 (talk) 22:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy birthday![edit]
Wszystkiego najlepszego z okazji urodzin! Niech się spełnią wszystkie Twoje marzenia! Życzę twórczego sukcesu!
Happy birthday! May all your dreams come true! I wish you creative success!
--George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Jacek Halicki! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:24, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
|
 |
⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐
The file File:2017 Smog nad Nową Rudą.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 |
⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐
The file File:2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 10.JPG, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 |
⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐
The file File:2014 Kłodzko, starówka 12.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
|
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:La Pyramide Abidjan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2022 Krzyż Pielgrzyma do Ziemi Świętej (rewers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2022 Krzyż Pielgrzyma do Ziemi Świętej (avers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2022 Modrzew europejski w Górach Bystrzyckich, w Sudetach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2022 Modrzew europejski w Górach Bystrzyckich, w Sudetach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Marie Curie c1920.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FMSky (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Psycho 1960 Lobby Card.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sété40 (talk) 04:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Michał Barczak.jpg[edit]
|
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Michał Barczak.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Masur (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2022/2023![edit]
|
* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Jacek Halicki! * | |
-- George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
Wesołych Świąt, Jacek![edit]
|
|
* Happy Holidays 2022/2023! * | |
-- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
File tagging File:Andrzej-trautman-2010.jpg[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Andrzej-trautman-2010.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Andrzej-trautman-2010.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Ciasteczka Oreo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Mysz komputerowa Logitech G903 Lightspeed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
"Corrected by"[edit]
I am certain I never asked you to overwrite File:Fremont Fair 2009 pre-parade 28.jpg, and in general one is not supposed to overwrite contributions by still-active participants in Commons without their consent. I didn't object, but I'm very unhappy with a bot (I presume at your behest) coming back a decade later and adding a category saying you "corrected" my image, as if there was something "incorrect" about my own work. Assuming that was at your behest (and actually do "correct" me if I'm wrong about that), I am therefore asking you never again to overwrite another image of mine. - Jmabel ! talk 01:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
|
File:Tabliczka klasycznej czekolady Milka.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Ubcule (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Obiektyw AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f 3.5-5.6G ED VR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Obiektyw AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm f 3.5G ED VR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Nikon bagnet F.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Wkrętak elektryczny Xiaomi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Porst Reflex CX6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Magne-B6 Max (suplement diety).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Gold-Vit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Cavinton Forte 10 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Diohespan max 1000 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Duspatalin retard 200 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Ibuvit D3 4000 IU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Loperamid 2 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:2023 Gin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Kosmetyki Ziaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Logo Ziaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Buty Nike Air Jordan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Elektroniczny termometr lekarski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Ranlosin 0,4 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Ketonal 50 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Doreta 75 mg + 650 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Rennie Antacidum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Nifuroksazyd Hasco 100 mg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Valbon Camembert klasyczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Alkohole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Nalewki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Question Could you identify the liqueurs by name in the file description? This could be a good VI if we have clear descriptions. -- 
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Rumy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Gin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2023 Odznaka Każdy kłos dla wroga cios.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|