Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rijkswaterstaat logo.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Rijkswaterstaat logo.png[edit]

Copyright violation. Logo is excepted from CC0: see https://www.rijkshuisstijl.nl/over-de-rijkshuisstijl/auteursrecht-rijkshuisstijl (in Dutch) KKoolstra (talk) 11:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/copyright Alexander vee (talk) 12:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And that copyright notice states that CC0 does not apply to the images on the website. So this does not contradict the copyright message on www.rijkshuisstijl.nl, which applies to logos etc. used by national government organizations. KKoolstra (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And additional the link to the link to the official 'Regulation': [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KKoolstra (talk • contribs) 13:00, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Photographs published after August 2015 but before is accepted Alexander vee (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The official regulation does not mention the date August 2015. It explicitly lists the 'Rijkslogo' as copyrighted. And the Rijkswaterstaat logo clearly includes the Rijkslogo. The Rijkslogo is not included in the CC0 license. Period. By keeping this file here, Wikimedia is violating Dutch law. KKoolstra (talk) 13:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment: A deletion would set a precedent for deleting dozens of files in Category:Images from Rijksoverheid.nl and Category:Logos of governments and government agencies of the Netherlands.
At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo rijksoverheid.svg the logo was kept, because the Dutch government seems to have published the image under CC0, which is an irrevocable license. TilmannR (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol keep vote.svg Keep This logo consists of two aspects: one is already unde CC0, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo rijksoverheid.svg. The text part fails COM:TOO and the Best Western test in order to be protectable. So questions of whether it's licensed too are moot anyway. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]