↓ Skip to nominations ↓

Other languages:

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose[edit]

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines[edit]

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators[edit]

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements[edit]

Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements[edit]

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality[edit]

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting[edit]

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value[edit]

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate[edit]

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations[edit]

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images[edit]

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review[edit]

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion[edit]

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision[edit]

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 2023.
Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 2023.

Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 08 2023 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules[edit]

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 09:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day.

March 8, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Wooden hut, Impasse du docteur Calmette 5, in Sequedin, France --Velvet 07:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Cuvelier Fauvarque wine cellar, Rue Vanderhaghen 100, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 07:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination eggs of great tit - Oeufs de Mésange charbonnière --Ercé 07:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Statue of St. Kunigunde on the Lower City Hall Bridge in Bamberg --Ermell 06:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cross on the abbey church of the former monastery in Ebrach --Ermell 06:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Top of the crossing tower of the abbey church of the former monastery in Ebrach --Ermell 06:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Crossing tower of the abbey church of the former monastery in Ebrach --Ermell 06:53, PromotionMarch 2023 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Hotel Agalia in Murcia --Ermell 06:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Right valve of a Grooved Carpet Shell, Ruditapes decussatus --Llez 06:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Frost-covered closed flower of a Crocus vernus (spring crocus). Focus stack of 10 photos.
  --Famberhorst 06:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Stained-glass windows in a church --Romainbehar 06:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion The photo is a bit on the dark side. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech. (fencing)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The emptiness is palpable on this sad day at Noarderleech.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Saints Domninus, Dionysius and Our Lady church in Seychalles, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Former St George chapel in Lezoux, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Wayside cross in Peschadoires, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination St Caprasius church St-Jean-d'Heurs, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Town hall of Lempty, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Burdhwan House, bangla academy --Wasiul Bahar 04:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Burdhwan House, bangla academy --Wasiul Bahar 04:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Abandoned lock at Burdhwan House, bangla academy --Wasiul Bahar 04:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Sculpture of begum rokeya at Burdhwan House, bangla academy --Wasiul Bahar 04:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Premises of ekushe boimela 2023 --Wasiul Bahar 04:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination American saxophonist Ravi Coltrane performing at his opening show at the Blue Note Jazz Club in New York City on March 7, 2023 --Frank Schulenburg 04:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Window shutters on 10.-Oktober-Straße #67 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Villa on 10.-Oktober-Straße 86 and villa Adele on 10.-Oktober-Straße #94 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Overhead crossing of the railway track «Drautalbahn II» on Scherzweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Broken acrylic glass at the overhead crossing of the railway track «Drautalbahn II» on Scherzweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Marienvilla, architectural design by Ing. Carl Miller, year of creation: 1895, Main street #112, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Monkey figure, Chinese horoscope. --Rjcastillo 03:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dog figure, Chinese horoscope. --Rjcastillo 03:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:55, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Lantern (lighting). --Rjcastillo 03:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Trees of lights. --Rjcastillo 03:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Pichidangui Beach, Los Vilos. --Rjcastillo 03:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Hydrometer --Jacek Halicki 02:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Magne B6 Forte --Jacek Halicki 02:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination VHS tape 1 --Jacek Halicki 02:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination VHS tape 2 --Jacek Halicki 02:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Compact cassette and microcassette --Jacek Halicki 02:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Replica of Shaheed Minar --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Replica of Shaheed Minar --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Replica of Shaheed Minar --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dentonia Park Swings --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dentonia Park Slides --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Fire hydrant in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 00:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Small observation tower in the Special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 00:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Plaque in memory of Theodor Kiefer at the Aasee-Rondell in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 00:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Gable of the Audi Max/English Seminar (University of Münster) and tower of the former observatory in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 00:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination 4 outdoor lights at a restaurant in Tiberstrasse in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 00:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Car parked by construction site personnel in the clearance profile of the track. --Augustgeyler 00:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination RDRAM RIMM Memory Module --Mister rf 00:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination RDRAM RIMM Memory Module --Mister rf 00:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination RDRAM RIMM Memory Module --Mister rf 00:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination RDRAM RIMM Memory Module --Mister rf 00:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Oscilloscope tube - vertical and horizontal deflecting plates --Mister rf 00:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 7, 2023[edit]

- Nomination Ladders to Dead Man's Cove, White Cliffs of Dover. --Kallerna 19:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Malecón, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 19:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Nature as Mother, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 19:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Nice but oversharpened and tilted --Poco a poco 21:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Rain (sculpture), Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 19:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Malecón, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 19:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: La Rotonda del Mar, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 19:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Activities for making Mud Seed ball in BhopalI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: During Felicitation Ceremony Southern Command Indian Army BhopalI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Uniformed services (India) --Suyash.dwivedi 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Archaeologist Arun Sharma from Chhattisgarh India in a conferenceI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Archaeologist Rahul Kumar Singh from Chhattisgarh India in a conferenceI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 09:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Bajramath templeThis is a photo of ASI monument number I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination BMW X1 in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose The hood is overexposed. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Lynk & Co 01 PHEV in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Piazza della Repubblica, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Piazza Grande, Arezzo, Italy --Poco a poco 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Piazza Grande, Arezzo, Italy --Poco a poco 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  There's CA on the roof lights both in left and right side. Can you fix it? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Yes, sure, gone, but I considered it pretty slight CA given the file size. --Poco a poco 21:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Ponte Mazzini, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination View of the old money house in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Français : Tableau Saint Benoît Labre (Ars-sur-Formans). --Benoît Prieur 17:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Administration building of the "youth and social" of the town of Hof in Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: View of Borobudur Temple, Java, Indonesia --Jakubhal 16:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Jeep Comanche in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 16:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz EQE 500 in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 16:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Skoda Enyaq in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 16:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination chef's cane --Cephas 14:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination chef's cane, details --Cephas 14:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination chef's cane --Cephas 14:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: chef's cane, details --Cephas 14:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: bracelet --Cephas 14:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Preserved express steam loco 012 082 on the turntable at the German Museum of Technology. By: User:Mallard60022 --Nightflyer 12:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Distant view of Legon Campus (University of Ghana) from East Legon --MB-one 12:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dusk over Rio Paraíba in Cabedelo, Brazil --MB-one 12:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Panoramic view of Mönchbruch nature reserve on the last day of Summer --MB-one 12:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination eggs of great tit - Oeufs de Mésange charbonnière --~~~~
- Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 12:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Erythrina speciosa --Mike Peel 11:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Kumara plicatilis --Mike Peel 11:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Calle Larios, Málaga --Mike Peel 11:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  It needs a PC --Poco a poco 18:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Front entrance to Sudbury Hall --Mike Peel 11:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 11:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Mariembourg (Couvin-Belgique) - former town hall. --Jmh2o 11:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Abandoned bus in Bangladesh Shishu Academy --Wasiul Bahar 10:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Abandoned bus in Bangladesh Shishu Academy --Wasiul Bahar 10:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Abandoned bus in Bangladesh Shishu Academy --Wasiul Bahar 10:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Sadly cropped in from the bottom. Fixable? --MB-one 12:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  @MB-one Thanks for your review, I appreciate it. But this is the original frame, if you want I can crop from the bottom and change the composition a bit. Please let me know, thank you --Wasiul Bahar 19:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Bangladesh Police Armored Vehicle --Wasiul Bahar 10:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Can you please turn down the highlights a bit also increase the sharpness? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  @Fabian Roudra Baroi Thanks for the suggestion. I tried to correct the sharpness and light. Is it okay now? --Wasiul Bahar 07:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Duranta Sculpture in Bangladesh Shishu Academy --Wasiul Bahar 10:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Overexposed, sorry --Jakubhal 16:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: The church St. Georg in Pflaumdorf with fog --FlocciNivis 09:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination The filial church St. Jakobus in Schondorf am Ammersee --FlocciNivis 09:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: The Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption in Metz --FlocciNivis 09:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination The house at the Waldstraße 44 in Saarbrücken --FlocciNivis 09:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The memorial at the firestation 2, consisting of a former engine, in Saarbrücken-Burbach --FlocciNivis 09:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Landscape near Saint-Restitut in the French department of Drôme. --Cayambe 09:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Popular GOT badge --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Insufficient quality: not sharp enough for a still. --Peulle 08:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Comment Camera shake. Try Mirror lock-up. Use a more stable tripod. Use a remote control. Avoid f/16 or smaller if possible. Such flat objects should do with f/8 or f/11 for best sharpness. --Smial 13:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Small brown GOT badge --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose It is not sharp enough and lacks detail. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Small gold GOT badge --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Enchen Boost clipper --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Philips OneBlade --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Decapped IBM Monolithic Systems Technology ICs --Mister rf 07:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Oscilloscope tube - electron gun, vertical and horizontal deflecting plates --Mister rf 07:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination DDR2 SDRAM modules for desktop computers --Mister rf 07:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination DDR2 SDRAM modules for desktop computers --Mister rf 07:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination DDR2 SDRAM modules for desktop computers --Mister rf 07:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Hedge along the path bordering the A25 highway, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 07:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Railway tracks, Chemin de Busignies, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 07:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ceiling fresco in the emperor's hall of Ebrach monastery --Ermell 06:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. Magnificent subject. --LexKurochkin 13:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Fresco depicting a coat of arms in the Emperor's Hall of Ebrach Monastery --Ermell 06:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ceiling fresco in the emperor's hall of Ebrach monastery --Ermell 06:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Fresco depicting a coat of arms in the Emperor's Hall of Ebrach Monastery --Ermell 06:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Fresco depicting a coat of arms in the Emperor's Hall of Ebrach Monastery --Ermell 06:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Breil-Brigels Outflow of river Flem in Lag da Breil
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. View of the surroundings of Breil/Brigels.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. Rapids in mountain stream Flem.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Rue Alexandre Dumas in Thiers, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Saint Stephen church in Dorat, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Building at 3 rue du Marché in Thiers, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination 35 rue Conchette in Thiers, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination ND-de-la-Route de Pont-de-Dore, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Water Fountain, Square Los Dominicos. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Headquarters of the Community Development Department, Municipality of Las Condes. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Festival of Lights, Chile 2023 - Lantern Festival. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination New Zealand Square, Providencia commune. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Festival of Lights, Chile 2023 - Lantern Festival. --Rjcastillo 03:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Freyung fountain by Kiki Kogelnik on 10. Oktober Platz, Bleiburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saints John and Paul in Gablern, Eberndorf, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Farmhouse lounge of famliy Kotschnig at Winklel #1, Feistritz ob Bleiburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Steel monument of a biking couple on a Harley-Davidson Fat Bob at a roundabout on Rosental Strasse in Faak am See, Finkenstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Overdoor at the portal of the traditional farmhouse “vulgo Keuschnig” in Oberjeserz #4, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bunker 1 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 01:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Small observation tower in the Special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 01:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bust of the siblings Hans and Sophie Scholl (ca. 1955/56, initiator Walter Rest) at the assembly hall at the Platz der Weißen Rose in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 01:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Pedestrian passage (city center side) of the Golden Bridge in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 01:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bells of the Saint Vikor Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 01:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Replica of Shaheed Minar --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Replica of Shaheed Minar --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dentonia Park --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Saltwater Crocodiles --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Norvic 1 --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Alireza Shojaian with the PaykanArtCar car By User:Shojaian.alireza Hanooz 00:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Railway overpass over the snow-covered Zweinaundorfer Straße in Leipzig --Augustgeyler 00:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Leipzig, Herbartstraße with apartment house Mierendorffstraße 58 at the end. --Augustgeyler 00:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Children's balance bike parked in Herbartstraße, Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 00:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Construction of the eastern track at the half-finished central platform in Anger-Crottendorf. --Augustgeyler 00:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Half-finished platform of the stop Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf. --Augustgeyler 00:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 6, 2023[edit]

- Nomination Skoda Enyaq in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 22:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Volkswagen Taos in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 22:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cupra Leon Mk4 ST in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 20:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Lamborghini Urus Performante in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 20:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Mazda CX-5 Newground in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 20:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Des macarons de chez Bouillet (mars 2023). --Benoît Prieur 19:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dam San Niccolò, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 18:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Dam San Niccolò, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 18:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II and Sant'Angelo Castle, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II, Rome, Italy --Poco a poco 18:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Lautenschlagerstraße 22, 24 in Stuttgart. --Zinnmann 18:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Can you offer more picture at the bottom? --Poco a poco 19:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  No, sorry. i had to limit the bottom space in order to prevent cropping the roof. --Zinnmann 21:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I agree that crooping the roof would have been worse but I'm not convinced either if a bunch of the building at the bottom is cropped --Poco a poco 18:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Neoclassical portal of Reinsburgstraße 19, Stuttgart. --Zinnmann 18:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination eggs of great tit - Oeufs de Mésange charbonnière --~~~~
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Sophia Poppensieker, member of Tonbandgerät at Rio Reiser Fest in Unna. --Smial 15:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination La Nostalgia, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: En Busca de la Razón, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco) --Another Believer 14:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose The detail especially on the altar is too low --FlocciNivis 09:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco) --Another Believer 14:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Rosita Beach, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Red-shouldered hawk --Cephas 13:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Red-shouldered hawk --Cephas 13:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cooper's hawk --Cephas 13:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cooper's hawk --Cephas 13:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality --Mister rf 15:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Cooper's hawk --Cephas 13:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Nice work --Mister rf 15:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Curry plant, Helichrysum italicum --Mike Peel 11:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline In all the photos some of the leaves are overexposed. High noon, the worst time of day to shoot a good photo. Too much light for the camera sensor. --Mister rf 13:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose Sorry, the image has overexposed areas. --Mister rf 21:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Curry plant, Helichrysum italicum --Mike Peel 11:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Some of the leaves are overexposed --Mister rf 13:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose Sorry, the image has overexposed areas. --Mister rf 21:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Curry plant, Helichrysum italicum --Mike Peel 11:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Some of the leaves are overexposed --Mister rf 13:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose Sorry, the image has overexposed areas. --Mister rf 21:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Curry plant, Helichrysum italicum --Mike Peel 11:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Some of the leaves are overexposed --Mister rf 13:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose Sorry, the image has overexposed areas. --Mister rf 21:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Curry plant, Helichrysum italicum --Mike Peel 11:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline Some of the leaves are overexposed --Mister rf 13:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Agree, not a QI to me like this --Poco a poco 19:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  @Mister rf and Poco a poco: Hmm, perhaps cleaner to oppose then? Not sure there's much I can do to improve that. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose If you had posted only one photo, yes, it would have been easier, but as a group of 5, you may expect some reviews. Anyway, I’ve done it now. --Mister rf 21:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Wayside cross (1651), so-called "Fürstenkreuz", near Zemmer-Schleidweiler, Germany. --Palauenc05 10:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Wayside cross (1606), so-called "Hochgerichtskreuz", near Zemmer, Germany. --Palauenc05 10:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination A commemorative plaque to Jean Nicolas Houchard at the wall of the Château du Schlossberg in Forbach --FlocciNivis 09:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The Tour du Schlossberg in Forbach --FlocciNivis 09:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View on the Sacred-Heart-Church in Püttlingen-Köllerbach and to the right of it the transmitter tower Riegelsberg-Schoksberg --FlocciNivis 09:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 12:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination The former train station entrance building of Fürstenhausen in Völklingen-Fenne --FlocciNivis 09:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View from the nature reserve Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide to the landfill Nord-West with thw wind powerstation Freimann --FlocciNivis 09:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Nice atmosphere. Good quality. --Cayambe 09:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Intersection in the French department of Drôme. --Cayambe 09:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Commemorative plaque for poet Cläre Prem in Trier. --Palauenc05 08:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Aerial view of the Hirschaider Bahnhof construction site, looking south. --Ermell 07:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Neubau der Gleisanlagen im Bahnhof Strullendorf. Rechts die Abzweigung nach Schlüsselfeld. --Ermell 07:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Neubau der Gleisanlagen im Bahnhof Strullendorf. Rechts die Abzweigung nach Schlüsselfeld. --Ermell 07:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Flood trough bridge Wiesen --Ermell 07:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Residential house in Zapfendorf --Ermell 07:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Château Cuvelier-Crépy, Rue Albert Vanderhaghen 78, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 07:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Art Deco houses, Rue Albert Vanderhaghen 22 to 30, in Haubourdin, France --Velvet 07:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Concrete sleepers at newly built track in Leipzig --Augustgeyler 06:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Please have a look to the verticals. (The buildings in the background.) --XRay 07:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Thank you. Done --Augustgeyler 09:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Historic shop of a cultural heritage monument of a multiple dwelling in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 06:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Children's balance bike on a bicycle rack in front of a gym in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 06:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View from Heinrich-Heine-Park to the district of Halle Neustadt. --Augustgeyler 06:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Villa Lehmann in Halle (Saale). --Augustgeyler 06:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Close wing moisture sucking of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker (by Anitava Roy) --Atudu 06:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review The image has to much noise and is over processed in certain areas --Mister rf 08:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bridge Spannenburg about the Prinses Margriet Canal (detail)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Noise should be reduced. --Ermell 09:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Done. Color Noise Reduction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bridge Spannenburg about the Prinses Margriet Canal (detail)
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Motortankschip Leidsegracht ENI-nummer, 02312117 on the Prinses Margriet Canal
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Our Lady priory in Noalhat, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Stained-glass window in the Saint Hilarius church in Limons, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Portal of the Translation of Saint Martin church in Crevant-Laveine, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Town hall of Luzillat, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Town hall of Puy-Guillaume, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Anna Katharina Emmerick grave in the crypt in the Holy Cross Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Bunker 1 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Plague/grinding grooves in the rear area (choir) of St Viktor Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Playing Field at Dentonia Park --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Sorry Fabian, not a QI, both sides are pretty blurry --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Great Blue Heron --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Sorry, the image is to noisy. ISO to high. --Mister rf 08:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Citizen CTZ-9104 watch --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  CommentThe image need to be rotated CW. And there are to many dust fiber very visible on the watch dark surface. --Mister rf 09:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Towarzystwo Tatrzańskie badge --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Small brown OTP badge --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination MOSO badge --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination PPS badge --Jacek Halicki 00:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion The square in the center requires that the image to be rotated CCW. Also, try to remove in post processing the few points of dust that are highlighted on the red background. --Mister rf 08:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)@Mister rf: Done--Jacek Halicki 08:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  OK. Nice work --Mister rf 08:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 5, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: East India replica Götheborg motoring through the Stockholm archipelago - port side view --Virtual-Pano 21:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: East India replica Götheborg port bow view --Virtual-Pano 21:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sailing vessel Götheborg - port side forward view --Virtual-Pano 21:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Close wing Nectaring of Leptosia nina (Fabricius, 1793) - Psyche --Sandipoutsider 02:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review The image is to noisy. ISO to high. For a wider DoF try close aperture by 1-2 stops, compensate by increase the exposure time --Mister rf 18:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Close wing position of Catochrysops strabo Fabricius, 1793 – Forget-me-not --Sandipoutsider 02:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Upper part of the image is not sharp enough.--Mister rf 18:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Close wing position of Spindasis ictis Hewitson, 1865 – Common Shot Silverline --Sandipoutsider 02:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Bench at Monumento al Clima --Mike Peel 11:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Bench at Monumento al Clima --Mike Peel 11:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ponte Vecchio, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 10:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  The light reflections on the water looks over processed or posterized. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  New version --Poco a poco 18:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Ponte Vecchio, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 10:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Ponte Vecchio, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 10:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Needs a perspective tweak? Leaning in on the sides. --Mike Peel 13:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  True, sorry for that, fixed --Poco a poco 18:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Ponte Vecchio, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 10:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: View from the St.-Martin-Square in Völklingen on the old city hall and behind it the church St. Eligius --FlocciNivis 10:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The rectory of the church St. Albert in Saarbrücken-Rodenhof --FlocciNivis 10:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Good image. But the verticals should be corrected. --Augustgeyler 00:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination View along the Jakobusstraße in Kutzhof with the water tower and the winding tower of Holz in the background --FlocciNivis 10:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: The building of the restaurant Burgschenke in Kutzhof-Numborn --FlocciNivis 10:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination View along the Lebacher Straße to the church St. Erasmus in Heusweiler-Eiweiler in Saarland --FlocciNivis 10:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC). There is a faint 'dustspot' in the sky above the red facade house at left. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 18:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Done, removed the dust spot. Thank you! --FlocciNivis 18:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality now.--Cayambe 08:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Tambov. Monastery of Our Lady of Kazan --Alexxx1979 09:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  slight cw rotation needed. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Vladikavkaz. Prospekt Mira (Mira avenue) --Alexxx1979 09:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Statue of an angel on a grave --Romainbehar 08:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Anti-intrusion concrete blocks stored on the Pyramides site, in Lille, France --Velvet 08:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Saint Leodegar church in Chavaroux, Puy-de-Dôme, France. --Tournasol7 05:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed

March 4, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: View of the Pacific Ocean, Panamericana Ruta 5 North, Chile. --Rjcastillo 17:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Some stitching errors to remove at the horizon line; see notes. --Milseburg 10:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for you review, I'll try again. --Rjcastillo 02:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Houdan Église Saint-Jacques-le-Majeur et Saint-Christophe (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 14:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  I don't understand the subject of the photo, is the church, the plant or what? --Ezarate 23:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Sailboat Doña Francisca in Port of Piriapolis, Uruguay --Ezarate 12:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Fountain of Neptune, Boboli Gardens, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 11:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Clouds look overexposed, and background building is tilted - fixable? or crop? --Mike Peel 11:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Ok, fair, I reduced the highlights and applied a crop, good to go? --Poco a poco 18:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Palazzo del Comune, Arezzo, Italy --Poco a poco 11:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Volkswagen Golf Alltrack in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 10:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination: View to the church St Vitus in Windach --FlocciNivis 09:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View along the Enzianweg in Greifenberg up to the war memorial --FlocciNivis 09:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View on the Jardin des Deux Rives in Strasbourg, France with the Passerelle Mimram in the background --FlocciNivis 09:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 9 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 09:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 9 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 09:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 11 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 09:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 11 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 09:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: No. 11 Strada Dumbrava Roșie, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 09:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: signpost to Westerplatte barracks - cut from a WWII tank plate --Virtual-Pano 08:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Eastern view of the seven sisters - waterfalls in Geiranger Fjord --Virtual-Pano 08:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View of the hedge separating the port of Lille from the Boulevard de la Lorraine, in Lille, France --Velvet 07:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: La Nostalgia, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 03:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Question What about the complete feet? --Milseburg 11:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Malecón, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 03:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Replica of Shaheed Minar --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed

March 3, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Leipzig Anger-Crottendorf halt under construction. By User:Wdwdbot --Augustgeyler 20:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Street sign in Santiago de Compostela (A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 20:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Good Idea to take individual photos of these signs! But for this kind of motive it should be sharper. --Augustgeyler 01:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Street sign in Santiago de Compostela (A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 20:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Street sign in Santiago de Compostela (A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 20:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Medium resultion. But it lacks sharpness. --Augustgeyler 01:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Street sign in Santiago de Compostela (A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 20:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Street sign in Santiago de Compostela (A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 20:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Medium resultion. But it lacks sharpness. --Augustgeyler 01:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Houdan Maison (by GFreihalter) --Sebring12Hrs 19:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: L'église paroissiale de Saint-Léonard vue depuis le village de Saint-Léonard. --Espandero 19:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Le cours de la Borgne à Bramois. --Espandero 19:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: La passerelle en bois de Bramois en 2023. --Espandero 19:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Place of Shmankivtsi castle, Ukraine. --Максим Огородник 18:26, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review IMO the image is not sharp enough. --Mister rf 18:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Volunteer fire department in Hof-Wölbattendorf, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination House with a plant ball at en:Saint-Étienne. --Touam 18:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Needs a vertical perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 22:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  No, I prefer like that, sorry. Anyway, thank you for you review. --Touam 06:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose So I have to decline. Feel free to ask other reviewers at discussions. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Building in the Baku freight railway yard --MB-one 13:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Decathlon store in Ayawaso East, Ghana --MB-one 13:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review IMO the subject is too small compared to the background. there are elements that can distract attention from the main subject.--Mister rf 14:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Grave candle and decoration on a grave at Waldfriedhof Obermenzing in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 11:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Detail of a funeral Wreath at Waldfriedhof Obermenzing in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 11:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Funeral Wreath at Waldfriedhof Obermenzing in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 11:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review IMO the framing chosen for the photo is not the best to highlight the main subject, there are elements that can distract attention from.--Mister rf 12:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Joanna of Austria as the Abundance by Pietro Tacca, Boboli Gardens, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 10:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review I don't think this is the optimal angle to take a photo of this subject. From this angle, I would choose a pic to includes only the upper part. Also the subject is too small compared to the background, maybe a cropped pic will do better. --Mister rf 14:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  IMHO this is a matter of taste. I believe that the photographer can decide in cases like this whether it would place the camera there where the statue is starring. --Poco a poco 18:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: View down the stairs of the tower, that is part of the castle Kirkel --FlocciNivis 09:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination View to the memorial for Maximilian I, Elector of Bavaria, on the Wittelsbacherplatz in Munich --FlocciNivis 09:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose The car in the front is disturbing. --Augustgeyler 01:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination: Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 07:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  This one looks like #25 but with lower level of detail --Poco a poco 10:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Boards go to en:toilet in en:Saint-Étienne --Touam 05:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Cuolm Sura. View (from Surcuolm) on the clouds above the mountains on the south side of the valley.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Good quality,but I would prefer a darker background --Michielverbeek 06:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Bedankt voor je opmerking. Wil je dat ik iets verander?--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:30, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Nee, want ik vind het wel een QI. Ik geef alleen mijn mening om de foto nog wat mooier te maken --Michielverbeek 08:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Ik heb de foto toch iets donkerder gemaakt. Bedankt voor de tip.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Erizados, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 04:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  I needs to be rotated cw. --Augustgeyler 07:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Playa Conchas Chinas, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 04:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Level of details is too low. --Augustgeyler 07:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Nature as Mother, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 04:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Please, check the horizonthal line. --Tournasol7 05:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Organ of St Nikolai, Kiel --Virtual-Pano 00:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality --Palauenc05 08:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Kiel water front --Virtual-Pano 00:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality --Palauenc05 08:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 2, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Alcazaba de Almería gardens --Mike Peel 22:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 22:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose When compared to 048.jpg, this one seems to be overprocessed (stone walls show marks of posterization and they lack detail). --Draceane 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 22:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Draceane 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 22:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: High-rises in East Legon, Greater Accra --MB-one 20:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  The crop with the power pole at the top is a bit unfortunate, can you improve this? --FlocciNivis 09:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I can crop in more from the top. --MB-one 12:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Cultural heritage monument of a multiple dwelling in Leipzig --Augustgeyler 20:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  There is color noise which needs to be removed (see especially the sky) --FlocciNivis 09:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Comment Done --Augustgeyler 01:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Amphitheatre, Boboli Gardens, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 19:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Unfortunately the top of Obelisk is out of focus as well as all other objects on the plane. Sorry. --Ermell 15:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Kuta Beach, Bali --Jakubhal 19:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support I like the composition. --Palauenc05 08:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Street light in Pisa, Italy --DnaX 19:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Minor chromatic aberration on the street lamp on the left. Fixable --Jakubhal 19:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Santa Maria della Spina in Pisa (Italy) --DnaX 19:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Please, apply a PC --Poco a poco 20:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: A caterpillar of Graphium nomius (Esper, 1799) - Spot Swordtail. By User:Anitava Roy --Bodhisattwa 17:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review The body of the caterpillar is not fully focused, for a wider DoF try close aperture by 1-2 stops, it can be compensated from the exposure time,ISO. --Mister rf 21:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Dhunachi is a Bengali incense burner used for one of the stages during aarti, or ritualized dance worship. By User:Bhuppigraphy --Bodhisattwa 16:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Please remove the watermark. --Zinnmann 14:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: View from the hiking trail Blies-Grenz-Weg over a landscape of the Bliesgau Biosphere Reserve --FlocciNivis 11:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: A Grey Heron at a cutoff meander of the Saar in Saarbrücken --FlocciNivis 11:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Cropping out the blue box in the left would make the composition better, IMO. --Draceane 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: General overview of the village of Sopoto (Aroania) in Achaia --FilipposTrains 10:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination General overview of the village of Alestaina in Achaia --FilipposTrains 10:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Blown out sky (especially in the left). --Draceane 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Nordkapp approaching Honningsvag --Virtual-Pano 09:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Tromsdalen church --Virtual-Pano 09:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: A caterpillar of Hyarotis adrastus (Stoll, 1780) - Tree Flitter. (by Anitava Roy) --Atudu 05:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  dust specks above and below caterpillar --Virtual-Pano 09:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Great Blue Heron --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline That’s a grainy photo. Why ISO speed rating: 3,200 and exposure time: 1/1,250 sec? --Mister rf 09:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I wanted to take a picture of the bird taking off. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose So, with so much noise, a photo of a bird in flight would have been a good image to promote? Sorry, not a QI for me. --Mister rf 08:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)@Mister rf: Thanks for your review, Ik that. But at that time I didn't know much about commons. My pictures were driven towards social media. My recent pics are more towards common. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  @Fabian Roudra Baroi: It’s more related to know the limits of your gear. For that camera above ISO 800, is a no, no, on any daylight pics. There should not be two quality sets for photos, personal ones and Commons ones. --Mister rf 07:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 1, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Riga's panorama from the St. Peter's Church. --Respublik 23:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Persepctive is deformed, it needs a positive correction in LR --Michielverbeek 06:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Travelators à fr:Gare de Lyon Hall 2 --Touam 20:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Gold badge „Za zasługi w dziedzinie geodezji i kartografii” --Jacek Halicki 18:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Too many dust fiber/particles on the picture. Some area are overexposed. IMO some too dark reflections in the central area. --Mister rf 07:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Silver badge „Za zasługi w dziedzinie geodezji i kartografii” --Jacek Halicki 18:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review Too many dust fiber/particles on the picture. Some area are overexposed. Some CA around the red areas. --Mister rf 07:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Xiaomi temperature and humidity sensor --Jacek Halicki 18:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Hurtigruten vessel Nordlys passing Tromsdalen church --Virtual-Pano 13:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality --Mister rf 13:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Engine bay of a VW Golf CityStromer --MB-one 11:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Toyota Vitz (XP90) in Ghana --MB-one 11:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: View over a street to the winding tower of the mine Camphausen --FlocciNivis 10:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: A crucifix near the chapel of the Holy Cross in Püttlingen --FlocciNivis 10:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: The main altar of the church St. Ludwig in Saarlouis --FlocciNivis 10:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Playground, Rue du Blason, in Villeneuve d'Ascq, France --Velvet 08:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Connecting Tunnel of two Buildings --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Scotia Bank Arena --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed

February 28, 2023[edit]

- Nomination Orto di Giove, Boboli Gardens, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 21:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Huawei P30 Pro on a tripod --Jacek Halicki 15:51, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Polish Wikipedia logo --Jacek Halicki 15:51, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Details of sculpture "GlasArche 3", Wiek am Darß --MB-one 15:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Los Muertos Pier, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  needs a CW (clockwise) tilt --Virtual-Pano 15:04, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Vallarta Dancers, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  needs a CCW (counter clockwise) tilt --Virtual-Pano 15:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Sign for Paco's Ranch, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico --Another Believer 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination Monumento Espacio Tiempo y Movimiento, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Mariembourg (Couvin-Belgique) - Église Sainte-Madeleine. --Jmh2o 13:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Please rotate CCW. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Done using the center of the cross and the middle of the clock --Jmh2o 07:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Monte Corneto (Bombone) seen from the locality Nazio - Rignano sull'Arno Florence. --PROPOLI87 13:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Sorry, too little details. --Zinnmann 18:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Paradisino - Lawn and staircase on the back - Vallombrosa – Reggello. --PROPOLI87 13:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sculpture Geistkaempfer by Ernst Barlach (close-up) - seen from SW --Virtual-Pano 11:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: A former office building, which is part of the ensemble Alte Schmelz --FlocciNivis 10:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Winter morning in Bangladesh By User:Mehediabedin --Wasiul Bahar 09:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Waves breaking at the Puerto de la Cruz sea wall, Tenerife --Mike Peel 07:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed
- Nomination: Maksymilian Biskupski: Christ of Reconciliation --Mike Peel 07:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review needed

February 27, 2023[edit]

- Nomination The shadow of a tree, rue du lieutenant Maurice Knoblauch in en:Saint-Étienne. --Touam 19:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco) --Another Believer 16:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Level of detail is too low. --Augustgeyler 07:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco) --Another Believer 16:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Level of detail is too low. --Augustgeyler 07:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Friendship Fountain, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 16:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Decline
  Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 15:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Hastings beach, Kent, UK. --Kallerna 11:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Eastern great egrets (Ardea alba modesta) on a paddy field in Ubud, Bali --Jakubhal 07:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

February 26, 2023[edit]

- Nomination: Cruise ship Deutschland departing from Bergen, Norway --Virtual-Pano 23:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Looks too grainy to me. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I will check how much detail will be lost by 'denoising' - Thanks for the review --Virtual-Pano 17:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Done Please check --Virtual-Pano 00:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Headband --Cephas 22:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  DoF low, category for the location (museum) missing --XRay 09:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination Pont Saint-Bénézet in Avignon. -- Rolf Kranz 18:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Numerous dust specks in the sky - vertical perspective correction needed --Virtual-Pano 23:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Done Thanks for the feedback ----Rolf Kranz 18:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  still lots of specks (non birds) in the sky - vertical alignment to the left is off - sorry --Virtual-Pano 23:47, 28 February 2023 /> Comment The supposed black spots in the sky are ravens flying over the Rhone in the evening. For the vertical alignment I have oriented myself to the bridge chapel. Of course, it would have been even more ideal if I could have used a tripod. But because I wanted to photograph the famous bridge from an unusual perspective, namely from the reeds, the ground was too damp and I had to photograph from the hand.--Rolf Kranz 19:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Support Good quality now --Virtual-Pano 09:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Lille 22 26 rue la boetie (by Velvet) --Sebring12Hrs 12:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  Can you fix the perspective a bit? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I'm not able to do that, but I can't see any perspective problems here. --Sebring12Hrs 19:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination NIO ET7 at Retro Classics 2022.--Alexander-93 09:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nomination: Ermita Cruz Verde, Puerto de la Cruz --Mike Peel 08:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Review
  There is chromatic aberration to be removed from the edges of the roof and the lamp post. --Augustgeyler 17:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  @Augustgeyler: Thanks for the review, but I can't spot it? Could you highlight the CA on the file page? Also please check you're looking at the new version, CA was definitely there in the previous one! Thanks. Mike Peel 11:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  OK, I might have seen the first version. CA is corrected. The only thing will be to correct the verticals: The image needs a little cw rotation and a proper perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 00:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Dülmen,_Kirchspiel,_ehem._Sondermunitionslager_Visbeck,_Wachgebäude_--_2020_--_2447.jpg[edit]

Nomination Special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Withdrawn
Comment Can you turn down the highlights a bit? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done Thank you. I tried to improve the bright area, but it's a difficult light situation with very bright sky parts. May be it's not good enough. --XRay 07:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral I'm not sure so I'll be neutral and send it to CR. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I'm sure. ;-) The easiest way: I withdraw the nomination. We do not need a discussion. Thank you for your review. --XRay 09:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes? --Augustgeyler 09:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jardín_de_Bóboli,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-19,_DD_17.jpg[edit]

Nomination Boboli Gardens, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 10:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Oppose sorry, blown out areas in the clouds --Draceane 12:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Fixable, I'll upload a new version tomorrow, latest Monday Poco a poco 12:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- New version Poco a poco 18:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Should be OK now --Draceane 07:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Augustgeyler 09:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Marquette_jardins_familiaux_chemin_de_wervick.jpg[edit]

Nomination Allotement gardens, Chemin de Wervick, in Marquette-lez-Lille, France --Velvet 07:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Oppose overprocessed. --Tomer T 09:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Overprocessed ? I don't agree. --Sebring12Hrs 22:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Augustgeyler 09:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:At_At_Santa_Cruz_de_Tenerife_2023_083.jpg[edit]

Nomination Monumento a García Sanabria --Mike Peel 11:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
~~Oppose~~ It also needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 19:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Michielverbeek: Perspective tweaked, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral It looks better, so I retire my objection. However space in top is very small and it's also a bit noisy --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Michielverbeek 06:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:At_At_Santa_Cruz_de_Tenerife_2023_085.jpg[edit]

Nomination Monumento a García Sanabria --Mike Peel 11:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
~~Oppose~~ It needs a perspective correction, background at the left is far from straight --Michielverbeek 19:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Michielverbeek: Perspective tweaked, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 12:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral It looks better, but it is not straight enough to get my support --Michielverbeek 06:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Michielverbeek 06:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Alcazaba_de_Almería_2022_027.jpg[edit]

Nomination Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 07:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure, if the left edge of the tower is curved or it's a lens-related distortion. --Draceane 10:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Draceane: I've checked, and lens corrections are turned on, so I don't think it's the lens? But am not sure. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose Underexposed. The exposure should be more natural. --Augustgeyler 06:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Augustgeyler: Brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 11:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - Neutral Switching to neutral. It is exposed naturally now. Thank you. --Augustgeyler 09:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but I can't go for this perspective.--Der Angemeldete 14:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Augustgeyler 09:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:20210412_Bürgerpark_Saarbrücken.jpg[edit]

Nomination View from the Bürgerpark Saarbrücken to a building with a tower crane above it --FlocciNivis 10:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The elements of good composition are missing in this pic. --Mister rf 17:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Mister rf --GRDN711 20:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Augustgeyler 06:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Sunflower_in_Sri_Lanka.jpg[edit]

Nomination Sunflower in Sri Lanka --A-wiki-guest-user 14:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The image is not sharp enough.--Mister rf 17:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 10:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support It's focussed, it's sharp, it's some sort of bug and a flower in there, what else do we need for a good QI?--Der Angemeldete 14:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Augustgeyler 06:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Vista_panrámica_Playa_Las_Brisas,_Los_Vilos,_Región_de_Coquimbo.jpg[edit]

Nomination Panoramic view Las Brisas Beach, Los Vilos, Coquimbo Region. --Rjcastillo 17:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Decline
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Stitching errors and dust spots should be fixed. --Ermell 19:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done Thanks. --Rjcastillo 21:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - Comment Stitching errors are still visible. Sorry. --Ermell 22:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I see the same things as Ermell. This is a nice photo and worth fixing. -- Ikan Kekek 00:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- CommentIn the first photo, the one on the left side, the horizon line is not straight. That's why the photo stitching is not done correctly. --Mister rf 09:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_March_2023_-_119.jpg[edit]

Nomination Tritón y Sirena, Puerto Vallarta --Another Believer 03:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Please, check the horizonthal line. --Tournasol7 05:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good to me. Seems like a natural perspective. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 09:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alcazaba_de_Almería_2022_026.jpg[edit]

Nomination Entrance to Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 07:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the sky seems to be too dark for this period of the day. --Tournasol7 19:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Tournasol7: Sky lightened, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 11:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Ok to me.--Der Angemeldete 14:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support OK for me --LexKurochkin 20:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 20:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Galería_Uffizi,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-18,_DD_36.jpg[edit]

Nomination Sant'Ambrogio Altarpiece by Sando Botticelli, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 16:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Decline
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I think the light reflection on the upper left part is covering parts of the painting and therefore the image is not meeting QI standards. --Augustgeyler 23:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak Oppose per August. I also think it could be a bit sharper. -- Ikan Kekek 00:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Galería_Uffizi,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-18,_DD_24.jpg[edit]

Nomination Presentation of Jesus at the Temple by Ambrogio Lorenzetti, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy --Poco a poco 16:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Decline
Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I think the light reflection on the upper part is covering parts of the painting and therefore the image is not meeting QI standards. --Augustgeyler 23:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per August. A lot of it is lovely. Maybe there could be a way to dial back the brightest highlights, but I'd have to see the results. -- Ikan Kekek 00:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 09:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Volkswagen_Taigo_1X7A6743.jpg[edit]

Nomination Volkswagen Taigo in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 15:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Comment Good quality, but looks like it needs rotating clockwise a bit --Mike Peel 18:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 15:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - Support Good quality. Much better now, thanks. --Mike Peel 07:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose As this picture is showing a car parking on a downhill street, it should be rotated to match the verticals in the background. --Augustgeyler 13:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Augustgeyler: I disagree (as above). The car is the main subject so shouldn't be tilted. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Strong tilt, per Augustgeyler. --Smial 15:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment I reverted the rotation.--Alexander-93 19:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 06:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Fuente_Mayor,_Perugia,_Italia,_2022-09-20,_DD_25.jpg[edit]

Nomination Fontana Maggiore, Perugia, Italy --Poco a poco 10:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Due to the vertical tilt of the camera the main object (fontana m.) is vertically distorted. --Augustgeyler 11:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment IMHO a harsh review, hardly noticeable. Anyways, I've uploaded a new version with more perspective correction and also some aspect ratio adjustment to compensate it. Poco a poco 18:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Neutral Switching to neutral. Thank you. I did not want to be harsh. You improved the perspective. It is now technically perfect. But I now see why I sill can't support this nomination: The high up angle of view makes a nice composition with the background, but might not be suitable for showing the fountain. In addition the main object is in shadow. --Augustgeyler 09:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Augustgeyler 09:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Alcazaba_de_Almería_2022_025.jpg[edit]

Nomination Entrance to Alcazaba de Almería --Mike Peel 07:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Underexposed IMO. --Draceane 12:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Weak support Fixed now. I agree with Augustgeyler (the perspective isn't ideal here, but IMO it's the only way how to capture this view). --Draceane 09:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support Good enough IMO --LexKurochkin 17:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment I never had a chance to see it my own eyes, but as far as I understand the case there is just no chance to set camera at some place suitable for "QI standard" image. From this angle, yes, we have visible perspective inconsistences to the standard, but correcting them to vertical verticals and so on would make the image worse. I think, that rather complex case was handled in a good way. -- LexKurochkin 14:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose It need the perspective correction and is too dark. Tournasol7 19:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Draceane and Tournasol7: Brightened. Trying to correct the perspective from this angle doesn't work well. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose To me, the composition of brightness and sharpness of the object fits together in a quite interesting way. However, the perspective is odd, unfortunately.--Der Angemeldete 14:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support Reviewing this nomination under my private criteria I really love this composition and especially the angle of view. But this eventually might not be the case for our QI criteria. On the other hand QI standards are telling that we can make exceptions for the vertical perspective rules. I think this is worth making such an exception. --Augustgeyler 09:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 14:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Strachy_na_Lachy_Rockowizna_2022_Gdańsk_07.jpg[edit]

Nomination Krzysztof Grabowski --Msz2001 16:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Support DoF rather limited but compensated by capturing the mood imho --Virtual-Pano 18:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I disagree, hand and microphone are cut off and out of focus. --Jacek Halicki 21:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Insufficient DoF and, yes, I would cropped out the microphone completely. --LexKurochkin 17:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per Virtual-Pano. Very difficult lighting well handled. Good sharpness. If there is any problem with the crop or the composition, I would crop a bit on the left and the right side, but that is not very important. --Smial 15:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes? --LexKurochkin 17:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

File:Luxembourg_Cents_–_Restau_Centser_Roud_Haus.jpg[edit]

Nomination Restaurant in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 17:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion
Comment Needs a slight rotation ccw. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment Sorry, but all the verticals appear vertical to me. Could there be a confusion with one other image here? --Cayambe 21:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - Oppose I'm talking about horizontals and perspective, check the difference of the space between the house and the frame on both the left and right bottom, at left bottom there is more space with the frame than right bottom. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    - Comment Thank you Fabian for the review. I understand what you are saying. Nonetheless, I wish to hear other opinions. Cheers, --Cayambe 19:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The verticals are perfect. The only thing is, that it was not taken 100 % from the front. But that's a very minor issue. --August Geyler (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality --Milseburg 14:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 00:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. I do not see any problems here. --LexKurochkin 18:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Looks like the street slopes a bit. Critics here may come from an optical illusion?--Der Angemeldete 14:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 18:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]

Tue 28 Feb → Wed 08 Mar
Wed 01 Mar → Thu 09 Mar
Thu 02 Mar → Fri 10 Mar
Fri 03 Mar → Sat 11 Mar
Sat 04 Mar → Sun 12 Mar
Sun 05 Mar → Mon 13 Mar
Mon 06 Mar → Tue 14 Mar
Tue 07 Mar → Wed 15 Mar
Wed 08 Mar → Thu 16 Mar

Commons:Quality images candidates

Purpose[edit]

Guidelines[edit]

For nominators[edit]

Image page requirements[edit]

Creator[edit]

Technical requirements[edit]

Resolution[edit]

Image quality[edit]

Composition and lighting[edit]

Value[edit]

How to nominate[edit]

Number of nominations[edit]

Evaluating images[edit]

How to review[edit]

Grace period and promotion[edit]

How to execute decision[edit]

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Consensual review process[edit]

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

Consensual review rules[edit]

Nominations[edit]

March 8, 2023[edit]

March 7, 2023[edit]

March 6, 2023[edit]

March 5, 2023[edit]

March 4, 2023[edit]

March 3, 2023[edit]

March 2, 2023[edit]

March 1, 2023[edit]

February 28, 2023[edit]

February 27, 2023[edit]

February 26, 2023[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

File:Dülmen,_Kirchspiel,_ehem._Sondermunitionslager_Visbeck,_Wachgebäude_--_2020_--_2447.jpg[edit]

File:Jardín_de_Bóboli,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-19,_DD_17.jpg[edit]

File:Marquette_jardins_familiaux_chemin_de_wervick.jpg[edit]

File:At_At_Santa_Cruz_de_Tenerife_2023_083.jpg[edit]

File:At_At_Santa_Cruz_de_Tenerife_2023_085.jpg[edit]

File:Alcazaba_de_Almería_2022_027.jpg[edit]

File:20210412_Bürgerpark_Saarbrücken.jpg[edit]

File:Sunflower_in_Sri_Lanka.jpg[edit]

File:Vista_panrámica_Playa_Las_Brisas,_Los_Vilos,_Región_de_Coquimbo.jpg[edit]

File:Puerto_Vallarta,_March_2023_-_119.jpg[edit]

File:Alcazaba_de_Almería_2022_026.jpg[edit]

File:Galería_Uffizi,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-18,_DD_36.jpg[edit]

File:Galería_Uffizi,_Florencia,_Italia,_2022-09-18,_DD_24.jpg[edit]

File:Volkswagen_Taigo_1X7A6743.jpg[edit]

File:Fuente_Mayor,_Perugia,_Italia,_2022-09-20,_DD_25.jpg[edit]

File:Alcazaba_de_Almería_2022_025.jpg[edit]

File:Strachy_na_Lachy_Rockowizna_2022_Gdańsk_07.jpg[edit]

File:Luxembourg_Cents_–_Restau_Centser_Roud_Haus.jpg[edit]

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)[edit]

Navigation menu