Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal things[edit]Nominating[edit]Guidelines for nominators[edit]Please read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents[edit]There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." Photographs[edit]On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audio[edit]Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominations[edit]If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new users[edit]Adding a new nomination[edit]If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Strongly recommended: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. Voting[edit]Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policy[edit]General rules[edit]
Featuring and delisting rules[edit]A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be polite[edit]Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken. See also[edit]
|
Table of contents[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Heilbronn - Böckingen - Friedhof - Blick von der Kapelle zum Haupteingang (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 22:24:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created & uploaded by User:Aristeas - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support I like this photo very much. That's probably all that needs to be said on my behalf (except: is there a better way to categorize cemeteries?), but I'll be interested to see what you all think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Seven Sisters 3.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 20:18:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United Kingdom
Info Beachy Head and Belle Tout lighthouse in East Sussex, England. Two existing FPs: File:Belle Tout lighthouse March 2017.jpg and File:Seven Sisters Panorama, East Sussex, England - May 2009.jpg. Created, uploaded and nominated by kallerna. —kallerna (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support —kallerna (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support That's quite striking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Support per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 06:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:52, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Melospiza melodia JRVdH 03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 15:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Passerellidae
Info created by Cephas - uploaded by Cephas - nominated by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Cephas (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Support RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Willersdorf Aisch Luftbild-20210704-RM-163114.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 15:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info The river Aisch near Willersdorf. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support I like it --PierreSelim (talk) 09:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img30 Oder railway bridge.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2023 at 15:20:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
Info Railway tracks towards the rail bridge Frankfurt (Oder), a crossing of Germany–Poland border. All by me --A.Savin 15:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 15:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice long sight lines and good light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Support per Ikan —Bruce1eetalk 06:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 09:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg. 18-09-2022. (actm) 09.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2023 at 05:40:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Musical instruments
Info Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg church interior, church organ and old fresco.s
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support It's a nice organ, but it's everything else that's in the picture that makes it beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Beautiful soft light and atmosphere. --Aristeas (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support At first I thought there was some sort of inverse vignetting going on ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Luzern asv2022-10 Pauluskirche img3.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2023 at 01:31:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Switzerland
Info Interior view of Pauluskirche (St. Paul's Church) in Lucerne; all by me --A.Savin 01:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 01:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support That's quite a beautiful church, and in a style I've never seen. Too bad the sides are a little unsharp, but I think it's a deserving candidate, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Crop works well too. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Weak oppose looks a bit off-centre to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:39, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Turritella maculata 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2023 at 07:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Turritellidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 457782 08:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 09:36, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora ante Týn, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-02, DD 259-261 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:35:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Czech_Republic
Info Church of Our Lady before Týn and Marian column, Prague, Czech Republic. The Gothic church is a dominant feature of the Old Town of Prague, in fact, it has been the main church of this part of the city since its foundation in the 14th century. The church's two towers are 80 m high, and each tower's spire is topped by eight smaller spires in two layers of four. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Lukas Beck (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 471359 08:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Torre de agua de Šítkov, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 02-04 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:32:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Czech_Republic
Info Water tower of Šítkov, Prague, Czech Republic. The tower was built to store water and was used to supply water for a fountain in New Town for about 200 years until 1913. It is 47 metres (154 ft) high and now is a restaurant inside. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 462631 08:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Micha (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Alfombra de algas amarillas, parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 42.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support That's a nice abstract shot, thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Ukrainian flag is everywhere --Ermell (talk) 23:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Original picture but no wow for me. Just a colorful mass, indistinct at thumbnail size, and indistinct at full size too. I appreciate the "abstract" aspect of the photograph looking like a painting, but beyond this the content is quite boring in my view. No personally touching detail. Punctum missing. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support On the one hand – yes, we cannot recognize much, its a colourful fluidum. On the other hand – when I look at it a while in full size it has a fascinating effect, I almost go into a trance, like when listening to some really cool music. OK, maybe that’s just mine, but imagine this as a big print on a whole wall in a club or a bar, the effect would be excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile Morin. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- From another world, I love it. Dinkum (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Another image with that Cocteau Twins album-cover vibe. Very pleasing to look at. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 478890 06:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose indistinct --Lupe (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
File:MTAB IORE 133 and 105 Kaisepakte - Stenbacken.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 21:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created and uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 22:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 02:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Beautiful composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support per Michielverbeek --Lukas Beck (talk) 08:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Composition and light -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support My favorite season, fall. Nice click. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support love the autumn colours! --SHB2000 (talk) 00:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 475215 08:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 12:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Support the light is wonderful. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Rickshaw back decoration.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 18:40:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info created by Mrb Rafi - uploaded by Mrb Rafi - nominated by Mrb Rafi -- Mrb Rafi (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Mrb Rafi (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment I love these decorated Rikshas and this is a very good example of one well photographed, except - could you perhaps work on the corp a bit? I find the way the tires are cut off not ideal. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kritzolina, thanks a lot for the comment. I had a very tight place to bring the rickshaw in my frame with a 50mm prime. I took more than 15 photos of it and only this one looked better. I was also feeling uncomfortable as I couldn't capture the tires fully in the frame. Would you please tell more about how I can crop it to look better? --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see an ideal solution, but perhaps experimenting with cropping off more of the tires could help. Kritzolina (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support I think there is indeed no ideal solution, I will support anyways because of the beauty of the subject and the quality overall. Kritzolina (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see an ideal solution, but perhaps experimenting with cropping off more of the tires could help. Kritzolina (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kritzolina, thanks a lot for the comment. I had a very tight place to bring the rickshaw in my frame with a 50mm prime. I took more than 15 photos of it and only this one looked better. I was also feeling uncomfortable as I couldn't capture the tires fully in the frame. Would you please tell more about how I can crop it to look better? --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment I wonder if this is covered by {{FoP-Bangladesh}}. If not, we have a problem... Yann (talk) 10:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yann, Thanks a lot for the comment. Yes, it falls under {{FoP-Bangladesh}}. The rickshaw was parked beside a under-construction rail road and the owner was having breakfast. I captured it during a photowalk (the category is yet not populated, hundreds of images are on their way to be uploaded). --Mrb Rafi (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's a utility object, just as any other vehicle. See COM:UA. --A.Savin 14:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment Beautiful, but very tight crops left and right that are causing me to hesitate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Weak support The quality is very good and the subject is very interesting. Though the crop is a draw back but IMO acceptable.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose tight crops, distracting background. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Weak support per Fabian. --Aristeas (talk) 06:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Weak support per Fabian. Background is a bit distracting. — Meghmollar2017 • Talk • 07:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Weak support per others.--Princess Rosalina 🍵 472998 08:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per SHB2000 --Ermell (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose. Cropped wheels and desaturated background, contrast, no wow. --Micha (talk) 00:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Regretful very weak oppose I like very much what this image wants to accomplish. But while it's definitely a QI, it isn't quite there for FP ... I think the background is just a little too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --El Grafo (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
File:RENFE 730 Linarejos-Pedroso.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2023 at 13:46:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support nice composition --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 07:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice Composition. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:44, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 458578 08:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Zemmer Fürstenkreuz 1651 (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2023 at 18:17:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info Sandstone cross (built 1651) on a hill near Zemmer, Germany, all by Palauenc05 -- (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support. Very good an impressive -- Spurzem (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Neutral could be a bit sharper --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I'd like to feature a photo of a wayside cross, but this is a good and not great composition to me, apart from L. Beck's point, which is less of an issue to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support I like the starkness. Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 459838 05:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Schloss Wernigerode 20211225 4.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2023 at 14:03:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Jasnaah - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support relatively small resolution indeed, but great composition in my eyes. -- Tomer T (talk) 14:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support per Tomer. Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Rosalina 🍵 459492 06:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Good composition, nice view. Technical note: It’s from a smartphone, but (as we already checked in the WLM jury) in this case the results are fine, without the usual oversharpening etc. --Aristeas (talk) 08:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support I'm a little hesitant because sharpness and detail aren't very high due to the equipment used, and the size of the photo barely fills a 4K screen, but indeed the scene and the composition are beautiful. The time of the year and of the day gives it a nice soft lighting without too much contrast and the framing of the snowy trees feels very natural. Lion-hearted85 (talk) 11:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Scene and composition are beautiful - you can sign that. That is: it is a very beautiful photo. However, for an "excellent" everything must be right. Here, technically much better candidates have already been rejected because of quality deficiencies (see for example in the full view the muddy looking forest and the roof of the castle). Sorry Je-str (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Je-str, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Per nomination --Kritzolina (talk) 09:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support. Very good composition -- Spurzem (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice touch of gold (at Golden Hour). --XRay 💬 12:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 09:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Klaksvík harbour.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2023 at 13:55:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Faroe Islands
Info created & uploaded by HylgeriaK - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 23:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Stores at the right are a bit hanging a bit to the left --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Oppose}
Comment
per Michielverbeek, a perspective correction would be nice; and at the right there are also some purple CAs.@HylgeriaK: I can make these corrections if you want. Do you have a raw image file (ARW file) for this image? It would be better to do the corrections on the base of the ARW file, but we can also use the JPG file if there is no ARW … Best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC) Done, see below. --Aristeas (talk) 06:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Oppose per Michielverbeek. Also a fairly average pic of Klaksvík from the many I've seen. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Nice colors and clear air, but overall the composition is't outstanding. --Milseburg (talk) 14:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 469897 02:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose colors --Mile (talk) 09:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Lukas Beck (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Info Espec. @Michielverbeek and SHB2000: In agreement with HylgeriaK I have uploaded a new version, developed from the raw image file. The perspective is corrected and CAs have been fixed. The crop is a little bit wider at top and bottom. There is a bit more microcontrast and some colours are a bit more vivid now – not because I had increased the saturation (actually I have decreased it), it’s just because the raw image file provides these colours. Hope it helps, --Aristeas (talk) 20:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support A beautiful and calming view. I love the clouds around the top of the mountain in the background. --Aristeas (talk) 20:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Support The clouds just above the hill are wow! --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Papaya - longitudinal section close-up view.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2023 at 16:12:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Support fresh perspective! --El Grafo (talk) 08:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Support Again excellent quality. --Aristeas (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Support I only recently learned that the seeds are edible -- they taste like little peppercorns. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Support They are? I didn't know anyone ate them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Good QI, but I do not see here reason for FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 17:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 06:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Rosalina 🍵 453584 09:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support who doesn't like a papaya? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Yellow orchid cluster.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2023 at 04:09:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
Info Cluster of yellow cultivar of Phalaenopsis sp. Backlit by sunlight diffused by a snow-covered window. Photographed and nominated by Gorillo.Chimpo (talk) 04:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Gorillo.Chimpo (talk) 04:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice. Please define the species. -- -donald- (talk) 07:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Added in the info. Gorillo.Chimpo (talk) 13:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not fond of this fully white background, that seems artificial or overexposed, but the most embarrassing in my view is the tight crop, at the right and at the top. These margins are too small -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. Very nice flowers, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)[edit]
Fri 03 Mar → Wed 08 Mar Sat 04 Mar → Thu 09 Mar Sun 05 Mar → Fri 10 Mar Mon 06 Mar → Sat 11 Mar Tue 07 Mar → Sun 12 Mar Wed 08 Mar → Mon 13 Mar
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)[edit]
Mon 27 Feb → Wed 08 Mar Tue 28 Feb → Thu 09 Mar Wed 01 Mar → Fri 10 Mar Thu 02 Mar → Sat 11 Mar Fri 03 Mar → Sun 12 Mar Sat 04 Mar → Mon 13 Mar Sun 05 Mar → Tue 14 Mar Mon 06 Mar → Wed 15 Mar Tue 07 Mar → Thu 16 Mar Wed 08 Mar → Fri 17 Mar
Closing a featured picture promotion request[edit]
The bot[edit]
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure[edit]
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to an appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2023), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request[edit]
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2023.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night shots, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination[edit]
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2023), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.